Sony Bank is reportedly pursuing a US license and partnering with Bastion as it develops a 2026 dollar stablecoin connected to its growing Web3 unit, BlockBloom.

Bitcoin opened the week in the red as fears of a Bank of Japan rate hike triggered a yen carry trade unwind, potentially risking a drop in BTC price to $67,000.

Canary Capital's dominance in the XRP ETF market could accelerate institutional adoption and influence future crypto investment strategies.

The post Canary Capital claims its XRP ETF surpasses all other XRP ETFs combined appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The significant liquidations highlight the volatility and risk in crypto markets, potentially deterring new investors and impacting market stability.

The post Bitcoin tumbles below $89,000, triggering over $200 million in long liquidations in past hour appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Charles Hoskinson has drawn a firm line under one of Cardano’s longest-running controversies, declaring that the allocation of Genesis ADA to Input Output (IO) and EMURGO was private profit for early risk, not a community-controlled pool to be repurposed for new initiatives.

Cardano Founder Closes Door On Genesis ADA Criticism

In a November 30 livestream titled “Genesis ADA,” the Cardano founder called the topic “a closed matter” and rejected renewed calls to use Genesis ADA for current integrations such as oracles and stablecoin issuers.

“The Genesis ADA is profit for services rendered taking a risk, doing an activity and building an ecosystem,” he said. “It was a deal between us and the primary buyers of ADA, the Japanese who put up the initial wave of capital to get it done […] Those are the people that mattered in that transaction and every single one of them has been made whole.”

Hoskinson walked through the original funding structure: a Japanese crowd sale that raised about $72 million, converted into bitcoin, and a “tripartid” model comprising the Cardano Foundation (governance), EMURGO (commercialization) and IO (protocol development). Based on the crowd sale pricing, IO’s Genesis ADA allocation was worth around $8 million at the time.

“For the vast majority of the early days of Cardano, the Genesis ADA sat around 4 to 8 cents in value,” he said, arguing that the founding entities accepted extreme risk — regulatory, technical and reputational — in exchange for that upside. “To say that somehow we don’t deserve what we’ve gotten when what we got was about $8 million for delivering a $15 billion ecosystem, it’s a statement made of a Twitter mob with no basis in reality.”

He framed the core objection as a misunderstanding of the original terms. If the community now insists that 100% of Genesis ADA must be spent, he argued, “then where was the profit for taking the risk?” He listed Japan and US regulatory exposure, the possibility of protocol failure, insider and outsider security threats, and potential civil or even criminal liability in the early days.

“Let’s be very clear here,” he added. “99.9% of cryptocurrency ventures fail. Cardano is one of only a handful like XRP and Ethereum that have survived over the last 10 years and has value greater than $10 billion […] For a little over $40 million, a 10 plus billion dollar ecosystem has been created that at one point reached over a hundred billion dollars of value […] By any measurement, this has been an overwhelming success.”

Hoskinson also pushed back hard against the idea that IO and EMURGO should function as de facto public utilities whose entire balance sheets exist for Cardano’s “common good.”

“The books of my company and the books of EMURGO as private companies are none of the concern or business of the community as a whole,” he said. “We owe you nothing but the work we promise to do and will continue to do if you so choose. Those are the terms and conditions.”

He contrasted demands to forfeit profits with the existence of an already sizable on-chain treasury. “Demanding that whatever profit or revenue that we’ve made over the last 10 years be forfeited for a greater good while the community sits on a more than billion ADA treasury […] is a pretty absurd thing,” he said, noting that the treasury mechanism itself was part of the original design he proposed.

Why The Debate Now?

The immediate flashpoint is a joint request for 70 million ADA from the treasury to fund a package of integrations, including providers such as Pyth, RedStone and Circle. Some critics have argued that such work should be paid from Genesis holdings instead. Hoskinson called that retroactive expectation “pretty absurd” given that those companies “didn’t even exist at the time.”

He stressed that the 70 million ADA “will not cover the total fee of all the integrations” and that IO, the Midnight Foundation and others will “have to put skin in the game” because they are large ADA and KNIGHT holders who want to see yield on those assets.

Framing the broader governance vote, Hoskinson presented the current moment as a 2026 “reset” from the original tripartite structure to a new “pentad” executive layer involving EMURGO, the Midnight Foundation, the Cardano Foundation, IO and Intersect. The goal, he said, is to coordinate strategy and negotiations with “some of the largest most predatory and aggressive companies in this industry,” where Cardano must “speak with one voice” to secure key deals.

“The Genesis ADA is a closed issue. You have seen the end results of it and we have all moved on as founding entities,” he concluded. “We now have to decide, do we want to do something new and different […] and put a new structure for 2026 so that we can build the necessary infrastructure for the DeFi ecosystem? Or don’t we? It’s just that simple.”

At press time, ADA traded at $0.38.

Bitcoin is still at a critical level, where the next move could be determined. With the current sentiment turning toward the negative, expectations remain that the next move for the Bitcoin price will likely be a rapid price crash. This seems to be supported by technical patterns that show that the cryptocurrency has broken below a major level. As previous performances show, the possibility that BTC will follow the historical trend is high and ultimately bearish for the price.

Why The Bitcoin Price Could Crash

As sentiment has plummeted and sell-offs have intensified, so have the probabilities for a crash risen. One major development that suggests that further decline could be coming is that the bitcoin price has lost a trend line on the log chart, a move that is historically bearish for the price.

Crypto analyst and CMT-certifed expert Tony “The Bull” Spilotro, highlighted this development, showing the bearish move. According to Spilotro, the Bitcoin price has now lost the log chart trendline that began back in 2024, and this holds immense consequences for the cryptocurrency.

Historically, whenever the Bitcoin price has lost this trend line on the log chart, the result has always been very bearish. The usual end result has been a crash in price; thus, it is important to keep an eye on this break. If it holds, it would mean that the BTC price decline is far from over.

The crypto analyst explains that the fractal might not be a given, and may not play out exactly, but that doesn’t mean it’s not important. “The fractal isn’t a guarantee, but a valid example of losing a linear trend line on a log chart not being something you should ignore,” Spilotro stated.

Essentially, if the trend does end up playing out as expected, then it would mean that the Bitcoin price crash is far from over. So far, there have been analysts warning of lower prices, with some expecting BTC to go as low as $50,000.

The digital asset landscape has matured significantly over the past several years. Simple spot holding is no longer the only viable strategy for generating substantial returns. Today’s market rewards precision, algorithmic discipline, and above all else, liquidity.

For skilled traders, the barrier to entry is rarely knowledge. Instead, it is capitalization. A trader may possess a strategy with a high Sharpe ratio and disciplined risk management, yet find their growth stunted by a personal account size that renders the math irrelevant.

This disconnect between skill and capital has given rise to a sophisticated ecosystem of crypto proprietary trading. The concept extends far beyond simply borrowing funds. It represents access to institutional-grade infrastructure that bridges the gap between retail speculation and professional execution.

The Capital Efficiency Paradox

Why do profitable traders fail to scale?

The answer often lies in mathematics rather than market movement. A trader operating with a 5,000 USDT personal account must take outsized risks to generate a livable income. This frequently leads to over-leveraging positions to the point of ruin. In contrast, a trader managing a funded account of 200,000 USDT can target conservative, low-variance moves and still generate substantial returns.

This dynamic creates what we might call the efficiency paradox: having more capital allows a trader to take less risk while making more money. By utilizing a proprietary firm’s resources, the focus shifts from desperate account flipping to sustainable wealth generation. The pressure to hit “home runs” evaporates entirely, replaced by the professional pursuit of consistent base hits.

Psychological Detachment as an Edge

When personal savings are on the line, emotional attachment distorts decision-making in profound ways. The fear of loss triggers the amygdala, causing traders to cut winners early. Even worse, it often leads to revenge trading after a loss. Proprietary trading constructs a firewall between the trader’s lifestyle and their trading capital, fundamentally changing the psychological equation.

In a funded environment, the downside is capped at a defined level. A trader might face a drawdown limit, but they are not risking their mortgage payment or emergency savings. This psychological freedom allows for the execution of strategies with cold, calculated precision. When the risk is systemic rather than personal, the trader can finally operate with the objectivity required to extract value from volatile markets.

Evaluating the Execution Environment

Not all funding models are created equal, and the differences matter significantly. In the early days of prop trading, firms were largely focused on Forex. They treated crypto as an afterthought, offering poor spreads and artificial slippage. The modern crypto trader requires a specialized environment built specifically for digital assets. If the underlying technology does not mirror live exchange conditions, the strategy is doomed to fail regardless of its theoretical merit.

A robust trading infrastructure must offer direct access to order books without intermediaries. Whether a trader is scalping Bitcoin perpetuals or navigating complex options strategies, the execution must be instantaneous.

This is where the distinction between a simulation and a career-building platform becomes evident. Identifying the best crypto prop trading firm requires careful examination of the execution model. The key is looking for firms like HyroTrader that route through major liquidity providers like ByBit or Binance rather than internal dealing desks that trade against their clients.

The Importance of True Market Data

A chart is only as good as its data feed, and this principle cannot be overstated. Artificial “wicks” designed to stop out retail traders are a hallmark of inferior platforms that prioritize their own profit over trader success. Professional prop firms utilize real-time data streams that ensure what a trader sees on the chart matches the global order book with complete accuracy.

For algorithmic traders and those utilizing automated bots, this transparency is non-negotiable. Strategies that rely on technical levels or high-frequency inputs cannot function properly if the price feed is manipulated or delayed. The ability to integrate tools like TradingView or connect via API directly to the exchange liquidity is what separates a gamified experience from a professional trading operation.

Meet HyroTrader

Founded in 2022 and based in Prague, HyroTrader is a proprietary trading firm specializing in cryptocurrency for traders. The company offers funded accounts of up to 200,000 USDT, which can be scaled to 1 million USDT with consistent performance.

Traders utilize real-time data to trade on ByBit or Binance through CLEO, ensuring authentic trading conditions. Profit sharing begins at 70% and can increase to 90%, with payouts made in USDT or USDC within 12-24 hours after earning $100 in profit.

Unlike many competitors, HyroTrader provides unlimited evaluation periods and refunds the challenge fee after the first payout, lowering entry costs. With over $2 million paid out and a global community, it offers a legitimate opportunity for skilled crypto traders to access institutional capital without risking personal funds.

Navigating Risk and Drawdown Constraints

The primary critique of proprietary trading is often the strictness of risk rules. However, these constraints are actually the training wheels of professionalism when viewed through the right lens. A 5% daily drawdown limit or a 10% maximum loss ceiling is not a trap designed to fail traders. It is a standard institutional risk parameter used by professionals worldwide. No hedge fund manager in the world is permitted to lose 20% of a portfolio in a single afternoon, and for good reason.

Learning to navigate these parameters is what refines a gambler into a genuine risk manager. The best environments offer unlimited time for evaluation, recognizing that quality trading cannot be rushed. The artificial pressure of a “30-day challenge” often forces traders to violate their own risk management rules just to beat the clock. Removing the time limit allows the trader to wait patiently for the highest probability setups, aligning their activity with market conditions rather than an arbitrary calendar deadline.

Scaling: The Path to Seven Figures

The trajectory for a crypto prop trader should not end at the initial funding stage. The true goal is scalability over time. A static account size eventually limits potential regardless of skill level, whereas a dynamic scaling plan rewards consistency and discipline.

Consider a roadmap that begins at 200,000 USDT. Through consistent performance, avoiding significant drawdowns, and hitting modest profit targets, a trader can see their allocation grow to 1,000,000 USDT. At this level, a profit split of 80% or 90% becomes genuinely life-changing, transforming trading from a side pursuit into a legitimate wealth-building vehicle.

The Cash Flow Advantage

Liquidity is king in any trading endeavor. In traditional finance, waiting 30 days for a wire transfer is standard practice. In the crypto ecosystem, money moves at the speed of the blockchain itself. Traders who live off their market returns require agility. They need the ability to request a withdrawal on a Sunday and receive USDT or USDC within hours rather than weeks.

This fluidity turns trading from a speculative venture into a reliable business operation with predictable cash flows. When profits can be realized and withdrawn immediately upon hitting a threshold, the feedback loop of success is powerfully reinforced. It allows the trader to compound their personal net worth steadily while leaving the firm’s capital at work in the markets.

The Future of Decentralized Opportunity

The convergence of cryptocurrency volatility and proprietary capital offers a unique moment in financial history. It allows individuals with skills to act as institutional players, regardless of their geographic location or personal net worth. The playing field has never been more level for talented traders seeking meaningful opportunities.

Whether employing high-frequency trading bots, executing manual price-action strategies, or hedging with options, the vehicle matters as much as the driver. By leveraging significant capital without personal risk, utilizing direct exchange execution, and operating within professional risk parameters, traders can unlock the full potential of the crypto markets. The era of the undercapitalized retail trader is ending. The era of the funded professional has arrived.

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any of the projects mentioned in this article. Investors are encouraged to perform necessary due diligence.

The post Why Pro Traders Choose Crypto Prop Firms appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin’s big buyers seem to have stepped off the gas.

For the better part of the last year or so, it felt like there was a constant tailwind behind Bitcoin’s price. ETFs vacuumed up coins, stablecoin balances kept climbing, and traders were willing to go to insane levels of leverage to bet on more upside. NYDIG called these the “demand engines” of the cycle in its latest report. The company argued that several of those engines have reversed course: ETFs are seeing net outflows, the stablecoin base has stalled, and futures markets look cautious.

That sounds rather ominous if you only read the headline. Unfortunately, as always, the truth is always somewhere in the middle. We will walk through each of those engines, keep the focus on dollars in and out, and end with the practical question everyone cares about: if the big machines are really slowing, does it break the bull market or slow it down?

When the ETF hose stops blasting

The simplest engine to understand is the ETF pipe. Since their launch in January 2024, spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US have brought in tens of billions of dollars in net inflows. That money came from advisers, hedge funds, family offices, and retail investors who chose a brokerage ticker as their preferred method of Bitcoin exposure. The crucial detail is that they were net buyers almost every week for most of the year.

But that pattern broke over the past month. On several days in November, the ETF complex logged heavy redemptions, including some of the largest outflows since launch. A few of the funds that had been reliable buyers (think BlackRock) flipped to net sellers. For anyone looking at a single day of data, it sure could have felt like the entire ETF market blew up.

The longer view is, of course, less dramatic but important nevertheless. Cumulative flows are still deeply positive, and all funds still hold a huge pool of Bitcoin. What changed is the direction of marginal money: instead of new cash flowing steadily in, some investors are taking profits, cutting exposure or moving into other trades. That means spot price no longer has a constant mechanical buyer sitting underneath it.

A lot of that behavior is tied to how investors now hedge and manage risk. Once regulators allowed much higher position limits on ETF options (from 25,000 to 250,000 contracts), institutions could run covered-call strategies and other overlays on top of their ETF holdings. That gave them more ways to adjust risk without dumping shares, but also drained some of the pure “buy and hold at any price” energy. When price surged toward the top, some investors capped their upside for income. When price rolled over, others used the same options market to hedge instead of adding more spot.

The second engine sits in stablecoins. If ETFs are the Wall Street-friendly funnel into Bitcoin, stablecoins are the crypto-native cash pile that lives inside the system. When USDT, USDC, and peers grow, it usually means more fresh dollars are arriving or at least being parked on exchanges ready to deploy. For much of the last year, Bitcoin’s big legs higher lined up with a growing stablecoin base.

That pattern is wobbling, as the total stablecoin supply has stopped growing and even shrunk a little in the past month. Different trackers disagree on the exact amount, but the drop is clear enough. Some of that can be put down to simple risk reduction: traders pulling money out of exchanges, funds rotating into Treasuries, and smaller tokens losing market share. But some of it is real withdrawal of capital from the market.

The takeaway here is straightforward: the pool of digital dollars that can chase Bitcoin higher is no longer expanding. That doesn’t automatically push price down, but it does mean every rally has to be funded out of a more or less fixed pot. There’s less “new money” sloshing around on exchanges that can instantly flood into BTC when sentiment turns.

The third engine lives in derivatives. Funding rates on perpetual futures are a fee that traders pay to keep those contracts in line with spot price. When funding is strongly positive, it usually means many traders are long with leverage and are paying to stay that way. When funding goes negative, shorts are paying longs and the market is skewed toward bets on downside. The “basis” on regulated futures like CME is simply the gap between futures and spot. A big positive basis usually shows strong demand to be long with leverage.

NYDIG points out that both of these gauges have cooled. Funding on offshore perpetuals has flipped negative at times. CME futures premia have compressed. Open interest is lower than it was at the peak. This tells us a lot of leveraged longs were washed out in the recent drawdown and haven’t rushed back. Traders are more cautious, and in some pockets they’re now willing to pay for downside protection instead of upside exposure.

This matters for two reasons. First, leveraged buyers are often the marginal force that takes a move from a healthy uptrend to a vertical blow-off. If they’re nursing losses or sitting on the sidelines, moves tend to be slower, choppier and significantly less fun for anyone hoping for instant all-time highs. Second, when leverage builds in one direction, it can amplify both gains and crashes. A market with less leverage can still move a lot, but it’s less prone to sudden air pockets triggered by liquidations.

So if ETFs are leaking, stablecoins are flat, and derivatives traders are cautious, who’s on the other side of this selloff?

Here is where the picture becomes more subtle. On-chain data and exchange metrics suggest that some long-term holders have used the recent volatility to take profits. Coins that sat dormant for long periods have started to move again. At the same time, there are signs that newer wallets and smaller buyers are quietly accumulating. Some address clusters that rarely spend have also added to their balances. And some retail flows on large exchanges still lean toward net buying on the worst days.

That is the core of NYDIG’s “reversal, not doom” framing. The most visible, headline-friendly demand engines have shifted into reverse just as price cooled. Underneath that, there’s still a slow transfer from older, richer cohorts to newer ones. The flow of this money is choppier and less mechanical than the ETF boom period, which makes the market feel harsher for anyone who arrived late. But it isn’t the same thing as capital vanishing altogether.

What this actually means for you

First, the easy mode is more or less gone for now. For much of the year, ETF inflows and growing stablecoin balances acted like a one-way escalator. You didn’t need to know much about futures funding or options limits to understand why price kept grinding higher, because new money kept arriving. That background bid has faded and, in some weeks, flipped into net selling, making drawdowns feel heavier and rallies harder to sustain.

Second, a slowdown in demand engines does’t automatically kill a cycle. Bitcoin’s long-run case still revolves around fixed supply, growing institutional rails and a steady expansion of places where it can sit on balance sheets, and those structures are still in place.

What changes is the path between here and the next high. Instead of a straight line driven by one giant narrative, the market will start trading more on positioning and pockets of liquidity. ETF flows may swing between red and green, stablecoins may bounce around a plateau instead of sprinting higher, and derivatives markets may spend more time in neutral. That kind of environment rewards patience more than bravado.

Finally, if you zoom out, reversals in the demand engines are part of how every cycle breathes. Heavy inflows set the stage for overextension, but then outflows and cooling leverage force a reset. New buyers arrive at lower prices, usually quieter and with less fanfare. NYDIG’s argument is that Bitcoin is somewhere in that reset phase, and the data supports that view.

The engines that drove the first leg of the bull run are running slower, some in reverse, but it doesn’t mean the machine is broken. It means the next leg will depend less on automatic pipes and more on whether investors still want to own this thing once the easy part has passed.

The post Bitcoin’s bull market: A slowdown, not a breakdown appeared first on CryptoSlate.

HBAR price is down about 6% in the past 24 hours, underperforming an already weak crypto market. Even with this pressure, the chart is flashing a rare mix of three early rebound clues that most mid-caps are not showing right now.

If the broader market steadies, HBAR could be one of the first to move, especially if it protects a key support level discussed later.

Accumulation Signs Build Beneath the Decline

HBAR has moved inside a broad falling wedge since early September. This pattern often turns bullish when sellers lose control near the lower boundary, and that shift first appeared around November 21.

The first clue comes from the changing volume behavior. HBAR’s activity follows a Wyckoff-style color pattern: red shows sellers in control, yellow shows sellers gaining control, blue marks buyers gaining control, and green shows buyers fully in control.

Since HBAR peaked at $0.155 on November 23 and fell nearly 15%, the bars have shifted from heavy red to a blend of yellow and blue. That blend is a classic sign of seller exhaustion and early tug-of-war. The last time this mix showed up — between October 15 and October 28 — HBAR climbed 41% right after.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

A second clue appears in the MFI (Money Flow Index), which tracks buying and selling pressure using both price and volume. Between November 23 and December 1, the HBAR price kept making lower highs while MFI made higher highs. That divergence shows dips are being quietly bought. A similar divergence formed between October 6 and October 24 and led to a 33% jump once it completed.

The third clue comes from steady spot ETF demand. The Canary HBAR Spot ETF has posted positive weekly inflows in four of the last five weeks, with more than $80 million in cumulative inflows. Inflows are smaller than late October, but they remain positive even as price falls — meaning broader demand has not vanished.

Together, these three clues — shifting volume control, dip-buying pressure, and ongoing ETF inflows — show early accumulation forming beneath the surface.

Key HBAR Price Levels Decide Whether the Rebound Can Hold

The wedge’s lower boundary near $0.122 is the most important support for HBAR right now. Holding that area keeps the rebound case alive. Losing it exposes the next major zone near $0.079, which would flip the structure from “early accumulation” to a deeper slide.

For strength, HBAR needs to reclaim $0.140 first, a 5% rebound from the current level. That would show that buyers are finally overpowering the sell-side pressure. If $0.140 breaks, the next major level sits at $0.155. Clearing $0.155 opens the path toward $0.169 and even $0.182 if the crypto market improves.

The post HBAR Drops 6% as Market Weakens, Yet 3 Early Rebound Clues Appear appeared first on BeInCrypto.

In today’s markets, uncertainty has become the new normal, putting pressure on traders and investors alike. Changing tariffs, shifting monetary policies, and persistent tensions are weighing on sentiment and dampening global growth. The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) expects global growth to decline to 2.3%, just 0.2 percentage points above the threshold for a global recession.

But beneath it all lies another enduring threat: inflation. Even as numbers improve, its effects continue to ripple through asset prices, investor behavior, and risk perceptions. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global inflation is projected to fall to 4.2%, down from 5.9% in 2024 and 6.8% in 2023. On paper, this is progress, but it’s nowhere near the levels it considers healthy.

For traders and investors, this means that while inflation may no longer dominate headlines, its presence will still define the landscape. Still shaping where capital flows, how portfolios are hedged, and which assets emerge as safe havens. And this is why many are now asking: Could crypto be emerging as the next inflation hedge, challenging the long-standing dominance of traditional safe havens?

Cryptos as Gold’s Challenger

Safe havens tend to perform reasonably well during recessions, and for decades, gold has been the default refuge, an anchor during economic storms. In recent years, bitcoin has emerged as its digital challenger, often described as “digital gold.” But that comparison might not be entirely grounded in reality. Let’s take a closer look.

On the surface, they seem alike, sharing certain traits: they are both scarce, speculative, and finite. Both are used in a limited capacity for transactions, influenced by demand, and dependent on third parties such as miners for supply. Yet, their behavior tells a different story.

Although cryptocurrencies tend to behave similarly to traditional assets during inflation, i.e., lose value, they behave differently when policy uncertainty is added to the equation. During past geopolitical instability, we have seen the market treat certain cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin, as safe havens. The reason behind this phenomenon is that cryptocurrencies are decoupled from government policy and currency manipulation, giving them an independent appeal during institutional mistrust.

This isn’t theoretical. Bitcoin rallied before and after the 2016 US elections, during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, and at other global events when confidence in traditional systems wavered. The question then isn’t whether bitcoin can move during uncertain times, but whether it can protect.

Is Bitcoin a Safe Haven?

A study by Sangyup Choi and Junhyeok Shin of Yonsei University’s School of Economics found that while bitcoin tends to depreciate during periods of financial uncertainty, it rises in value during times of policy uncertainty, precisely because it operates independently of governments and central banks.

We are now in such a period, one defined by both geopolitical tensions and shifting trade policies. In these conditions, investors often diversify across assets that aren’t directly tied to fiscal or monetary decisions. This is where bitcoin’s appeal lies: it represents freedom from institutional control, a self-contained system that functions outside the traditional policy loop.

Another study highlights the fact that it may be a strong hedge for oil, the US dollar, EU indices, and ETFs. It also suggests that the correlation between gold, bitcoin, and US indices such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 may indicate that investors are also starting to view the cryptocurrency as a safe haven.

Still, there is an important caveat. Cryptocurrencies remain inherently volatile, and bitcoin’s short history means its safe-haven status is conditional, not guaranteed. Gold, by contrast, has earned its reputation over centuries. For risk-averse traders, gold still offers stability, while bitcoin, with its asymmetric upside, may serve as a diversification tool rather than a replacement.

Hedging With Exness

A hedge is only as effective as the conditions that power it. In periods of volatility or uncertainty, when CFD traders turn to instruments like gold or bitcoin CFDs to manage exposure, execution quality becomes critical. In those decisive moments, it’s the trading conditions that determine whether your strategy holds or breaks.

Exness provides CFD traders better-than-market conditions, meaning spreads, execution, and withdrawals that outperform what’s typically available to market participants. Its proprietary engine ensures precise execution, even during high-impact news,¹ when traders need to rely on it the most for their hedge.

Price transparency and stable spreads also play a critical role. With its stable spreads on BTCUSD, which are four times lower than the industry average,²and the best spreads on XAUUSD,³Exness ensures that both digital and traditional hedges, like gold and bitcoin, work as intended.

The experience extends beyond the time markets are open. Exness has been offering the fastest withdrawals since 2009, and today, 98% of withdrawals are processed automatically.⁴

In essence, hedging with Exness means hedging with more control. CFD traders can execute, manage, and withdraw with the same confidence that drives their strategies, no matter how turbulent the markets become.

The post Inflation’s Silent Threat: Is Crypto Creeping in on Traditional Diversifiers’ Turf? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

What to Know:

• Bitcoin’s base layer still struggles with slow transactions, high fees, and limited programmability, creating a gap between its narrative and everyday usability.
• As demand for high-throughput DeFi and dApps grows, users increasingly expect instant confirmations and low fees, even when interacting with Bitcoin-linked assets.
• Bitcoin Hyper plans to introduce a Bitcoin Layer-2 with SVM integration, aiming to deliver faster-than-Solana performance while preserving Bitcoin’s settlement security.
• By combining low-latency execution, SVM-based smart contracts, and Rust tooling, Bitcoin Hyper targets wrapped $BTC payments, DeFi, NFTs, and gaming on a Bitcoin-secured backbone.

Bitcoin’s narrative is shifting again. After a decade of proving itself as pristine collateral and macro hedge, attention is swinging back to utility: payments that actually feel instant, and apps that don’t grind to a halt when demand spikes.

Yet on the base layer, Bitcoin still moves slowly, with limited capacity of just seven transactions per second, and no native smart contracts. That mismatch is becoming harder to ignore as users experience sub-second confirmations and near-zero fees on newer chains.

When you can move assets cheaply and interact with DeFi in real time elsewhere, waiting minutes for a Bitcoin transaction feels like a relic from another era. The demand is clear: keep Bitcoin’s battle-tested security, but upgrade the experience.

If it works, Bitcoin-native dApps stop being theory and start being everyday tools. And the $HYPER presale structure doubles down on that thesis.

With a staged price schedule and a $28.8M+ raise, early conviction is rewarded: those stepping in now are effectively betting that Bitcoin Hyper can become a go-to hub for high-speed, Bitcoin-backed DeFi and dApps, not just another speculative token.

Bitcoin Hyper Aims to Turn $BTC Into a High-Speed dApp Platform

Bitcoin Hyper pitches a straightforward value proposition: turn Bitcoin from a slow settlement rail into a high-throughput environment where you can pay, trade, lend, and game at speeds that compete with top Layer-1s.

Instead of fighting Bitcoin’s limitations, it will route activity to a Layer-2 execution environment while anchoring security back to the main chain.

By integrating the SVM, Bitcoin Hyper aims to deliver faster performance than Solana itself for many use cases, while still treating $BTC as the core asset in the ecosystem. That means high-speed payments in wrapped $BTC with low fees, plus DeFi primitives – like swaps, lending, and staking – that feel responsive rather than congested.

The project also targets builders with a Rust-based SDK and API support for NFT platforms and gaming dApps, giving developers a familiar toolkit while tapping into Bitcoin’s liquidity.

The early traction is notable: the presale has already raised $28.8M, signaling that the market sees potential in a Bitcoin Layer-2 that targets Solana-level speed.

$HYPER’s Presale Momentum Signals Rising Confidence

For Bitcoin holders tired of choosing between security and usability, Bitcoin Hyper offers a different trade-off: keep $BTC at the center, but get Solana-style speed and dApp depth. And as the presale races toward the $30M milestone, it’s securing investors and liquidity to entrench that position.

The presale’s pricing, early staking incentives, and clear focus on SVM-powered performance give $HYPER a differentiated pitch in a crowded market.

Bitcoin Hyper currently costs $0.013355 per token and dynamic staking at 40% APY right now. According to our Bitcoin Hyper price prediction, $HYPER has the potential to end 2026 at $0.08625 – that’s a ~546% ROI on today’s price.

Looking further ahead, $HYPER could reach $0.253 by 2030, a significant ~1,794% ROI. That upside scenario assumes the project becomes a leading venue for Bitcoin-native DeFi and high-throughput applications, not just another experimental scaling play.

Combined with 40% staking APY and rewards geared toward active governance, the tokenomics are clearly designed to favor early, engaged participants.

Bitcoin Hyper’s rise as a candidate for best crypto to buy now reflects a deeper shift in the market: users want Bitcoin’s credibility paired with modern UX.

If Bitcoin Hyper can bridge that gap between store-of-value and everyday utility and deliver on its promise of extremely low-latency execution, fast smart contracts, and a growing catalog of dApps, it could become a natural hub for Bitcoin-native activity.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice of any kind. Always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Authored by Aaron Walker, NewsBTC – https://www.newsbtc.com/news/best-crypto-to-buy-now-as-bitcoin-hyper-presale-nears-30m

XRP’s derivatives market has undergone a marked regime shift, with leverage collapsing and funding normalising in a way that signals a clear retreat from aggressive speculative positioning. The strongest evidence comes from Glassnode’s latest post on November 30, which frames the current phase as a structural, not merely tactical, pause in XRP leverage.

XRP Derivatives Unwind Accelerates

“XRP’s futures OI has fallen from 1.7B XRP in early October to 0.7B XRP (~59% flush-out). Paired with the funding rate dropping from ~0.01% to 0.001% (7D-SMA), 10/10 marked a structural pause in XRP speculators’ appetite to bet aggressively on upside,” Glassnode’s CryptoVizArt wrote on X.

Open interest at 1.7 billion XRP in early October reflected a heavily leveraged market, with large notional positions stacked in futures and perpetuals. The subsequent collapse to 0.7 billion XRP implies that around one billion XRP of derivatives exposure has been closed, liquidated, or otherwise unwound. Such a reduction is not just a marginal trimming of risk; it is a wholesale deleveraging that strips out a large part of the speculative layer sitting on top of the spot market.

The funding-rate move is equally telling. A 7-day SMA around 0.01% had previously indicated a consistent long bias, with traders willing to pay a recurring fee to maintain leveraged upside exposure. The compression to roughly 0.001% pushes funding close to neutral. In perpetual futures, that transition typically occurs when demand for leveraged longs fades and the market no longer tolerates a meaningful premium to hold long positions.

Glassnode’s description of October 10 crash as the point that “marked a structural pause” captures this shift in regime: the market moved from persistent long crowding to a far more cautious, balanced stance. The November 30 post sits on top of a broader context Glassnode has been documenting through November.

In November 8, the firm highlighted how profit taking has behaved during the recent drawdown: “Unlike previous profit realization waves that aligned with rallies, since late September, as XRP fell from $3.09 (~25%) to $2.30, profit realization volume (7D-SMA) surged by ~240%, from $65M/day to $220M/day. This divergence underscores distribution into weakness, not strength.” Rather than de-risking into strength, profitable holders have been realizing gains as price fell, reinforcing the deleveraging signalled by futures data.

On November 17, Glassnode turned to supply dynamics, noting that “the share of XRP supply in profit has fallen to 58.5%, the lowest since Nov 2024, when price was $0.53. Today, despite trading ~4× higher ($2.15), 41.5% of supply (~26.5B XRP) sits in loss — a clear sign of a top-heavy and structurally fragile market dominated by late buyers.” Those on-chain figures provide the background to the 30 November derivatives snapshot: a market whose ownership is skewed toward late entrants now sits on substantial unrealized losses, while the leverage that previously amplified upside has been largely flushed.

Taken together, Glassnode’s data on futures open interest and funding rates crystallise the current state of XRP: a violent 59% leverage reset, a near-neutral funding regime, and a speculative cohort that has stepped back from paying for upside, all layered on top of a top-heavy holder base.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.04.