November production rose 11% and contracted power topped 1.4 GW, even as falling bitcoin prices and tighter margins pressure the mining sector.

Multiple bullish signals, including a double bottom and falling wedge breakout, are aligning to potentially lift the BNB price toward $1,000 in December.

Polymarket's US app launch may drive institutional interest in crypto prediction markets, potentially reshaping event forecasting methods.

The post Polymarket launches US app after CFTC approval appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The launch of Franklin Templeton's Solana ETF signifies growing institutional interest in blockchain technology, potentially boosting Solana's adoption.

The post Franklin Templeton’s Solana ETF begins trading on NYSE Arca appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Crypto firm Ripple has revealed how it is capturing the projected $16 trillion tokenization industry by onboarding several institutions onto the XRP Ledger (XRPL). The firm alluded to security and how its custody service is helping solve this issue. 

Ripple Comments On How It Is Capturing The Tokenization Industry Using XRP Ledger

In an X post, Ripple indicated that it has managed to capture some of the projected $16 trillion industry onto the XRP Ledger through the adequate security it provides institutions. The crypto firm stated that it provides a security environment that mirrors the rigor of the banks it serves, combining HSM with FIPS-certified hardware to deliver security that scales. That way, they can protect assets without sacrificing operational speed. 

Ripple further noted that legitimate integration with the global financial system requires verification. That is why they adhere to SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 standards, ensuring that the infrastructure of these institutions that tokenize on the XRP Ledger is compliant with necessary regulations.  

Commenting on this, Ripple’s Head of Information Security, Akshay Wattal, said that in crypto, security isn’t a feature but the foundation of institutional trust. He added that effective custody requires in-depth architecture, battle-tested cryptography, and the governance rigor of a global financial institution. 

Notably, Ripple provides custody solutions to global banks, including BBVA, SG Fogre, DBS Bank, and DZ Bank. However, these banks are yet to tokenize on the XRP Ledger even as institutions move to tap into this $16 trillion industry. The crypto firm continues to propose several ways to onboard these institutions onto the network. 

One of Ripple’s proposals is the introduction of Confidential Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs) on the XRP Ledger in order to provide privacy for these institutions. The company’s developer, Ayo Akinyele, also recently proposed native XRP staking on the network, which could compel these institutions to build on XRPL, as they can earn yields while doing so. 

Progress On Other Sides Of Its Business

In addition to its custody service, Ripple is also making progress in other areas of its operations, which also drives value to the XRP Ledger. The company announced yesterday that it had partnered with fintech company RedotPay, which has integrated Ripple Payments to launch a crypto conversion feature for Nigerian users. 

The development also provides a huge boost for XRP, which will be one of the supported assets on RedotPay’s “Send Crypto, Receive NGN” feature. Ripple revealed that there are plans to support its RLSUD stablecoin in the future. Meanwhile, Bitcoinist reported that the crypto firm had scored a major win after the Monetary Authority of Singapore approved an expanded scope of payment activities for the company. This enables Ripple to broaden the range of regulated payment services it offers in the country.

In a significant development, the bearish action of the Solana price is currently spilling into the SOL-backed Treasury reserves. A recent report shows that corporate treasury companies are experiencing a sharp decline in their SOL holdings in the shadow of broader market unease.

Corporate Solana Reserves Continue To Bleed

Solana is experiencing a notable development that is capable of shaping its next market direction. Ted Pillows, a market expert and investor, shared on the X platform that the corporate treasuries of Solana are sinking further as the price of SOL struggles to regain upward traction.

According to the expert, SOL treasury companies are making new lows that echo through the on-chain corridors of the network. This implied that the wallets previously renowned for their steady accumulation are now showing diminishing conviction as balances discreetly shrink in the current bearish market phase.

The trend shows how institutional Solana holders are adjusting in the face of tightened liquidity and increased volatility, but it’s not a sudden exodus. Rather, it may be a steady, calculated exhalation.

Pillows highlighted that this drop to new lows is a major reason why the price of SOL has been performing badly, as buying demand has faded among institutional investors. Until these companies recover, the expert is confident that a recovery in SOL will be difficult.

However, Solana has started throwing up a quiet flare, one that heralds a recovery. After examining the altcoin’s price action on the weekly time frame, Ali Martinez, a crypto analyst and trader, revealed that SOL is flashing a bullish signal that points to a potential upward move. 

Martinez’s analysis hinges on the key Tom DeMark (TD) Sequential indicator. Since March 2023, the TD Sequential has proven to be very accurate when it comes to identifying SOL trend shifts on the weekly chart. During the ongoing bearish wave, the indicator is flashing a buy signal, suggesting that Solana is likely gearing up for a bounce.

SOL Activity Is On The Rise

Despite Solan’s price facing volatility, the leading network continues to wax strong as activity grows. In a post on X, Solana Daily disclosed that the network’s x402 activity is accelerating at a pace that feels more like an explosion this week. Currently, transactions are broadening, participation is expanding, and on-chain discussion is rising in the community.

The platform highlighted that the daily transaction volume on the protocol reached a new all-time high with approximately $380,000 processed on November 30 alone. This move to a new peak represents a 750% Week-over-Week (WoW) surge.

Furthermore, Solana has flipped the chart in dollar volume for the first time since its inception. With x402 transactions reaching new highs and a flip in dollar volume, the network is emerging as the most active in the cohort.

The conventional wisdom says veteran holders don’t sell into weakness. They accumulate through drawdowns, harvest gains during euphoria, and otherwise sit still while newer cohorts churn.

Late 2025 is testing that model. Across Ethereum, XRP, and pockets of the DeFi stack, dormant whales are moving supply to exchanges as mid-term buyers flee, creating a bifurcated distribution pattern that reveals which assets have genuine cost-basis depth and which remain top-heavy with recent entrants.

Distribution without capitulation

What makes this moment distinct is not the fact of selling, as veterans always rotate, but the timing and composition.

Ethereum whales accumulated 460,000 ETH as the price slid below $3,200 in mid-November, yet Santiment’s Age Consumed metric slowed rather than spiked.

That divergence matters: if fewer very old coins are moving while aggregate whale balances rise, the pressure comes from holders in the three-to-ten-year band trimming positions rather than ICO-era wallets dumping.

Glassnode data shows those mid-duration cohorts selling roughly 45,000 ETH per day, a measured pace that contrasts with the panic-driven spikes seen earlier in the year when both short- and long-term holders exited simultaneously.

XRP tells the opposite story. Dormant Circulation for the 365-day cohort spiked to its highest level since July as whales transferred months-long holdings to Binance, reactivating supply that had been untouched through the prior rally.

CryptoQuant’s 100-day simple moving average for the Whale-to-Exchange Flow metric peaked on Nov. 6, signaling a multi-month uptrend and suggesting the distribution is structural rather than episodic.

When combined with dormant-supply reactivations across both one-year-plus and three-to-twelve-month bands, the pattern is clear: XRP’s 2025 moves systematically drew out older holders who had waited through consolidation and now see exits as the rational trade.

Although the flow of whale exchanges has subsided, it remains among the highest levels observed in 2025.

The trade-off embedded in these flows is straightforward. Ethereum’s whales are rotating, and older holders are selling into strength as new buyers enter at higher cost bases, building a rising realized cap floor even as the price consolidates.

XRP’s whales are distributing into a market where latecomers already hold most of the realized cap at elevated prices, leaving no absorption cushion if spot demand continues to fade.

Realized cap as the structural tell

Realized cap measures the aggregate cost basis of all coins, weighted by the price at which they last moved. For assets that built genuine cost-basis ladders over multiple cycles, realized cap acts as long-term support.

For assets that printed most of their realized cap in a single blow-off, the structure is brittle: when the top cohort sells, there’s little underneath.

Ethereum’s realized cap was $391 billion as of Nov. 18, according to Santiment, absorbing distribution from older holders via fresh inflows even as price chopped sideways.

That continued accumulation at varied entry points means the network retains cost-basis diversity, short-term holders sit more exposed if another leg down materializes, but veteran cohorts trimming at $3,200 don’t collapse the entire structure because new participants filled the gap at intermediate levels.

XRP’s realized cap nearly doubled from $30 billion to $64 billion during the late-2024 rally, with $30 billion of that coming from buyers who entered in the last six months.

By early 2025, coins younger than 6 months accounted for 62.8% of realized cap, up from 23%, concentrating cost basis at cycle highs. Glassnode’s realized profit-to-loss ratio has trended downward since January, indicating that recent entrants are now realizing losses rather than gains.

When whales send old coins to exchanges in November, reactivating dormant supply at precisely the moment latecomers turn underwater, the realized cap imbalance becomes the central vulnerability.

Dormancy as a leading indicator

Dormancy metrics track when previously idle supply reenters active circulation. Spikes in these indicators don’t automatically signal tops, but rather signal regime change.

When holders who weathered prior cycles decide conditions warrant an exit, their movement often precedes broader distribution because they operate on longer time horizons and larger position sizes than retail cohorts.

Ethereum’s Age Consumed spikes in September and October came from ICO-era wallets finally moving after years of inactivity, but those moves happened into strength rather than panic.

By mid-November, as whales holding 1,000 to 100,000 ETH accumulated over 1.6 million ETH, the Age Consumed metric quieted, meaning the heavy flows were driven by large holders rotating rather than ancient wallets capitulating.

That creates a floor: if the oldest cohorts aren’t selling and mid-term whales are buying, spot absorption can handle measured profit-taking from the three-to-ten-year band.

XRP’s dormancy pattern broke the other way. The 365-day Dormant Circulation hit levels unseen since July, with repeated red spikes as old coins woke up and moved to exchanges.

The reactivations became more frequent as the price struggled to hold above $2, suggesting that holders who sat through the consolidation decided the risk-reward no longer justified their patience.

When dormancy spikes coincide with weakening spot demand and a top-heavy realized cap, the signal is unambiguous: veterans are distributing into a market that can’t absorb it without breaking price support.

Who holds the bag

If Ethereum’s distribution continues at the current pace, three-to-ten-year holders selling 45,000 ETH daily while whales accumulate and realized cap rises, the outcome is a market with higher long-term support but increased short-term volatility.

New entrants at $3,000-$3,500 become the marginal sellers if price breaks lower, while veteran cohorts sit on unrealized gains large enough to weather another drawdown.

If XRP’s dormant-supply reactivations persist while the realized cap remains concentrated among holders with six-month-or-newer holdings, the path narrows.

Each wave of veteran distribution pushes recent buyers further underwater. Because those recent buyers account for the majority of realized cap, their capitulation would collapse the cost-basis floor rather than merely test it.

The risk is self-reinforcing: whales distribute, latecomers sell at losses, realized cap falls, and the next cohort of holders faces an even weaker support structure.

For protocols like Aave, where dormancy data remains sparse, a single address crystalizing $1.54 million in losses by selling 15,396 AAVE into a downtrend signals forced or fear-driven exits from recent entrants, not long-term holders harvesting gains.

When those losses happen while the asset trades below all major moving averages and broader DeFi risk appetite deteriorates, late-cycle capital is exiting rather than rotating.

Who decides the floor

The central question is whether this cycle’s dormant supply reactivations represent healthy rotation, veteran holders exiting at profits while new capital enters at higher bases, or the beginning of a broader deleveraging where top-heavy realized caps collapse under sustained distribution.

Ethereum’s data suggests that older coins are moving. Still, the bulk of recent flow comes from mid-term whales trimming rather than ancient wallets dumping, and rising realized cap confirms fresh money continues to average in.

XRP’s data suggests that dormancy spikes are drawing out one-year-plus holders, while 62.8% of realized cap sits with buyers who entered in the last six months.

The outcome depends on which cohort blinks first. If recent entrants hold and spot demand stabilizes, veteran distribution gets absorbed, and the market builds a higher floor through turnover.

If latecomers capitulate before veteran sellers exhaust themselves, realized cap falls, cost-basis depth evaporates, and the next support level sits far below the current price.

Whales are stirring. Whether that’s a rotation or a rout depends on who’s left to catch what they’re selling.

The post While Ethereum whales rotate, XRP data shows a fatal concentration flaw that leaves one group holding the bag. appeared first on CryptoSlate.

BlackRock, the largest asset management firm in the world, has described tokenization as the most critical market upgrade since the early internet.

On the other hand, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) describes it as a volatile, untested architecture that can amplify financial shocks at machine speed.

Both institutions are looking at the same innovation. Yet, the distance between their conclusions captures the most consequential debate in modern finance: whether tokenized markets will reinvent global infrastructure or reproduce its worst fragilities with new velocity.

The institutional divide on tokenization

In a Dec. 1 op-ed for The Economist, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and COO Rob Goldstein argued that recording asset ownership on digital ledgers represents the next structural step in a decades-long modernization arc.

They framed tokenization as a financial leap comparable to the arrival of SWIFT in 1977 or the shift from paper certificates to electronic trading.

In contrast, the IMF warned in a recent explainer video that tokenized markets could be prone to flash crashes, liquidity fractures, and smart-contract domino cascades that turn local failures into systemic shocks.

The split over tokenization arises from the fact that the two institutions operate under very different mandates.

BlackRock, which has already rolled out tokenized funds and dominates the spot ETF market for digital assets, approaches tokenization as an infrastructure play. Its incentive is to expand global market access, compress settlement cycles to “T+0,” and broaden the investable universe.

In that context, blockchain-based ledgers look like the next logical step in the evolution of financial plumbing. This means the technology offers a way to strip out costs and latency in the traditional financial world.

However, the IMF operates from the opposite direction.

As the stabilizer of the global monetary system, it focuses on the hard-to-predict feedback loops that arise when markets operate at extremely high speed. Traditional finance relies on settlement delays to net transactions and conserve liquidity.

Tokenization introduces instantaneous settlement and composability across smart contracts. That structure is efficient in calm periods but can propagate shocks far faster than human intermediaries can respond.

These perspectives do not contradict each other so much as they reflect different layers of responsibility.

BlackRock is tasked with building the next generation of investment products. The IMF is tasked with identifying the fault lines before they spread. Tokenization sits at the intersection of that tension.

A technology with two futures

Fink and Goldstein describe tokenization as a bridge “built from both sides of a river,” connecting traditional institutions with digital-first innovators.

They argue that shared digital ledgers can eliminate slow, manual processes and replace disparate settlement pipelines with standardized rails that participants across jurisdictions can verify instantly.

This view is not theoretical, though the data requires careful parsing.

According to Token Terminal, the broader tokenized ecosystem is approaching $300 billion, a figure heavily anchored by dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT and USDC.

However, the actual test lies in the roughly $30 billion wedge of regulated real-world assets (RWAs), such as tokenized Treasuries, private credit, and bonds.

Indeed, these regulated assets are no longer restricted to pilot programs.

Tokenized government bond funds such as BlackRock’s BUIDL and Ondo’s products are now live. At the same time, precious metals have moved on-chain as well, with significant volumes in digital gold.

The market has also seen fractionalized real estate shares and tokenized private credit instruments expand the investable universe beyond listed bonds and equities.

In light of this, forecasts for this sector range from the optimistic to the astronomical. Reports from firms such as RedStone Finance project a “blue sky” scenario in which on-chain RWAs could reach $30 trillion by 2034.

Meanwhile, more conservative estimates from McKinsey & Co. suggest the market could double as funds and treasuries migrate to blockchain rails.

For BlackRock, even the conservative case represents a multi-trillion-dollar restructuring of financial infrastructure.

Yet the IMF sees a parallel, less stable future. Its concern centers on the mechanics of atomic settlement.

In today’s markets, trades are often “netted” at the end of the day, meaning banks only need to move the difference between what they bought and sold. Atomic settlement requires every trade to be fully funded instantly.

In stressed conditions, this demand for pre-funded liquidity can spike, potentially causing liquidity to evaporate exactly when it is needed most.

If automated contracts then trigger liquidations “like falling dominoes,” a localized problem could become a systemic cascade before regulators even receive the alert.

The liquidity paradox

Part of the enthusiasm around tokenization stems from the question of where the next cycle of market growth may originate.

The last crypto cycle was characterized by memecoin-driven speculation, which generated high activity but drained liquidity without expanding long-term adoption.

Advocates of tokenization argue that the next expansion will be driven not by retail speculation but by institutional yield strategies, including tokenized private credit, real-world debt instruments, and enterprise-grade vaults delivering predictable returns.

Tokenization, in this framing, is not merely a technical upgrade but a new liquidity channel. Institutional allocators facing a constrained traditional yield environment may migrate to tokenized credit markets, where automated strategies and programmable settlement can yield higher, more efficient returns.

However, this future remains unrealized because large banks, insurers, and pension funds face regulatory constraints.

The Basel III Endgame rules, for example, assign punitive capital treatment to certain digital assets classified as “Group 2,” discouraging exposure to tokenized instruments unless regulators clarify the distinctions between volatile cryptocurrencies and regulated tokenized securities.

Until that boundary is defined, the “wall of money” remains more potential than reality.

Furthermore, the IMF argues that even if the funds arrive, they carry hidden leverage.

A complex stack of automated contracts, collateralized debt positions, and tokenized credit instruments may create recursive dependencies.

During periods of volatility, these chains can unwind faster than risk engines are designed to handle. The very features that make tokenization attractive, such as the instant settlement, composability, and global access, create feedback mechanisms that could amplify stress.

The tokenization question

The debate between BlackRock and the IMF is not about whether tokenization will integrate into global markets; it already has.

It is about the trajectory of that integration. One path envisions a more efficient, accessible, globally synchronized market structure. The other anticipates a landscape where speed and connectivity create new forms of systemic vulnerability.

However, in that future, the outcome will depend on whether global institutions can converge on coherent standards for interoperability, disclosure, and automated risk controls.

The post BlackRock bets on tokenization, but IMF warns of uncontrollable ‘atomic’ domino effect appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Welcome to the US Crypto News Morning Briefing—your essential rundown of the most important developments in crypto for the day ahead.

Grab a coffee to read how the Bitcoin mining sector is changing. Skyrocketing costs, collapsing fees, and the rise of AI are forcing miners to rethink their playbook, turning once-stable operations into a battleground for next-generation compute power.

Crypto News of the Day: AI Takes Over Bitcoin Mining Racks as Costs Explode and Profitability Craters

The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining Report Q4 2025 reported that the sector has hit its breaking point. Production costs have surged to all-time highs, hash price has collapsed, and artificial intelligence (AI) is now outbidding miners for their own infrastructure, triggering the most dramatic structural shift the sector has ever faced.

The industry entered Q2 2025 with a brutal new reality:

• The average cash cost to mine one BTC among public miners jumped to approximately $74,600,
• All-in costs soared to $137,800.
• Transaction fees, once a buffer for miner revenue, fell below 1% of block rewards in May and June, the weakest contribution since the 2024 halving.

Yet even as margins collapsed, the Bitcoin network continued to climb, smashing through 1 Zetta hash/s for the first time in August.

Public miners contributed only about 80 EH/s of year-to-date growth, meaning most of the expansion is now coming from private operators, sovereign miners, and well-capitalized energy players with vastly cheaper power.

The result: miners are being diluted by hashrate growth they are no longer driving.

AI Moves In — And It Pays 10–20× More Per Megawatt

A far bigger disruption is unfolding at the infrastructure level. Industrial-scale mining campuses, comprising 100MW to 1GW sites, share nearly identical power, cooling, and rack density requirements with modern AI datacenters.

That overlap has turned mining facilities into prime targets for hyperscalers.

Deals from Google–TeraWulf, Google–Cipher, and multi-site agreements with Fluidstack signal the same direction, that big-tech is moving into miner-built capacity at a premium.

The math explains why. Bitcoin mining yields roughly $1 million per megawatt, while AI compute generates $10 million to $20 million per megawatt.

No miner can ignore that spread.

Industry Splits: AI Megacampuses vs. Mobile, Ultra-Low-Cost Miners

The sector is now diverging into two clear models:

1. 1. Megascale miners → fully or partially converting to AI/HPC

These facilities can upgrade their electrical topology and uptime standards to meet enterprise requirements. They’re signing decade-long contracts and shifting from volatile block rewards to stable, capacity-based revenue.

2. Low-cost, mobile miners → shifting to stranded energy

Miners unable to compete with AI are moving off-grid: flare gas, remote hydro, and surplus renewables. Portable rigs are being deployed everywhere cheap energy exists, echoing mining’s early decentralized roots.

This migration marks a long-term reshaping of the industry, and not a temporary cycle.

According to a CoinShares report:

• Hashprice averaged approximately $50 per PH/s/day throughout Q2, continuing its post-halving slide.
• With difficulty rising, fees stagnant, and Bitcoin trading mostly sideways, older ASIC fleets have been forced offline.

Analysts expect hashprice to remain range-bound between $37–55 per PH/s/day through 2028 unless BTC rallies far faster than hashrate growth.

A Structural Shift: AI Outbids Bitcoin

For the first time in Bitcoin’s history, miners are being priced out of their own infrastructure.

AI’s superior economics, hyperscaler deal flow, and the rising cost of industrial mining are pushing the industry into a permanent transformation.

The Bitcoin network remains strong, where hashrate is still climbing, but the business of mining is being rewritten fast.

This puts miners at an impasse, to either go big into AI, or go remote into stranded power.

Chart of the Day

Byte-Sized Alpha

Here’s a summary of more US crypto news to follow today:

• Yi He appointed Binance co-CEO amidst legal and regulatory challenges.
• Kevin Hassett as Trump’s Fed pick: How will his policy impact crypto in 2026?
• Ethereum Fusaka goes live today: Can it trigger a Pectra-like rally?
• Is Bitcoin ready to end its 5-week downtrend or face rejection at $95,000?
• Vanguard ‘degen effect’ fuels 10% surge for Bitcoin in explosive rebound.
• PENGU token jumps 30% on NHL Deal, but $108 million sell-off sparks fear.
• Binance marks 3 altcoins for delisting: Everything you need to know.
• V-shape bounce, rare Bitcoin signal, $13 billion Fed shock: What’s coming?

Crypto Equities Pre-Market Overview

The post Bitcoin Mining Hit Its Breaking Point — Now AI Is Taking Over Its Racks | US Crypto News appeared first on BeInCrypto.

XRP is attempting a strong recovery after last week’s decline, with the altcoin posting an 8% rise in the past 24 hours. 

The broader market’s positive shift is helping XRP regain momentum, but the real catalyst appears to be renewed confidence from large investors. This surge in whale activity could position XRP for a retest of multi-week highs.

XRP Whales Rescue The Altcoin

Whale buying has intensified as XRP approached the $2.00 psychological level earlier this week. On-chain data shows that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP collectively accumulated 620 million XRP in just a few days. At current prices, this accumulation is worth more than $1.36 billion. 

Such aggressive buying at discounted levels indicates that whales are positioning for a potential rebound and view the recent dip as a buying opportunity rather than a trend reversal. Their renewed confidence signals that the upside potential outweighs the short-term volatility.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

The macro backdrop for XRP is also showing marked improvement. The HODLer Net Position Change — an indicator tracking movements among long-term holders — is flashing bullish for the first time since mid-October. The metric has shifted back into positive territory, signaling that LTHs have stopped selling and are once again accumulating. 

Support from long-term holders is critical for maintaining price floors during periods of market uncertainty. Their return provides XRP with a more stable base and reduces the likelihood of major downside moves, priming the asset for sustained recovery should broader market conditions remain favorable.

XRP Price Has A Shot At Recovery

XRP is trading at $2.20 at the time of writing, up 8% in 24 hours after bouncing cleanly from the $2.00 intra-day low. The rebound from this key psychological level reinforces bullish sentiment and aligns with heavy whale accumulation.

Holding $2.20 as support places XRP in a strong position to target $2.36 next. If XRP manages to break this resistance, the altcoin could climb toward $2.50 and log its highest price in three weeks. Whale buying and LTH support make this scenario increasingly realistic.

However, failure to maintain investor confidence could still introduce downside risk. If selling pressure increases, XRP may slip back to the $2.02 support level. This would invalidate the bullish setup and erase recent gains.

The post XRP Jumps 8% as Crypto Whales Scoop Up $1.3 Billion  appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Dogecoin is staging a sharp rebound from a key technical level that one analyst has flagged as the potential low of its current correction.

Is The Dogecoin Bottom In?

On X, crypto analyst Kevin (@Kev_Capital_TA) highlighted the $0.138 region as the decisive line. Posting a weekly DOGE chart, he wrote: “$0.138 still holding strong on Dogecoin. If DOGE can hold this level (Macro .382 + 200W SMA) and BTC + USDT hold their respective support and resistance levels then $0.138 will be the lows for this corrective period. Still got work to do. Main focus is still BTC and USDT D.”

His chart shows Dogecoin trading on the 1-week timeframe, with the price recently wicking down into a dense support cluster around $0.138 and rebounding. That area coincides with the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement of the prior advance, explicitly marked “0.382 (0.13827),” and the rising 200-week simple moving average that has now climbed into the same zone. Furthermore, this area coincides with an upward trendline that has guided DOGE’s price action since mid-2023; a decisive break below it would be technically fatal.

The bounce has been visible on lower timeframes as well. DOGE traded as low as $0.13443 yesterday before surging to $0.152 today, gaining more than 13% at the intraday high.

Kevin has been emphasizing this level for weeks. On November 22 he told followers: “$0.138 is massive support on Dogecoin folks. You really do not want to see that lost on 3D-1W closes. Obviously BTC’s performance will be the determiner to that outcome so focus there first along with USDT D.” In his framework, the integrity of the DOGE support cluster is inseparable from Bitcoin’s higher-timeframe structure and stablecoin flows.

The macro background is shifting in his favor. Yesterday Bitcoin rebounded from $86,184 to $92,307, extended to $93,958 today and is currently around $92,816. Commenting on BTC, Kevin noted: “A close above $91K on the 3D-1W candle supports the idea that the counter trend rally is beginning in my BTC corrective phase reversal zone. One day doesn’t make a trend let’s see what we can do.”

That statement builds on his November 25 outlook, where he argued that the corrective phase he has been tracking since August–September on BTC and the “Total 2” altcoin index is nearing completion. “There will be a bottom formed and a counter trend rally in the coming weeks on BTC and Altcoins,” he wrote, adding that “the corrective phase is almost over” but still needs “a little more time to form a proper bottom.”

Kevin’s DOGE chart maps the alternatives clearly. Above, horizontal resistance near the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement sits around $0.19, while lower support is marked at the 0.236 retracement near $0.093 alongside longer-term trendlines.

Whether $0.138 becomes the definitive bottom of Dogecoin’s correction depends on two conditions Kevin keeps repeating: DOGE must continue to hold the macro 0.382 plus 200-week SMA and the uptrend line on 3-day to weekly closes, and Bitcoin must confirm its own counter-trend rally with sustained higher-timeframe strength.

For now, the market has made its tell clear. The answer to whether the Dogecoin bottom is in starts—and potentially ends—at $0.138.

At press time, Dogecoin traded at $0.14976.

XRP’s price pullback deepened this week, but a high-timeframe technical view keeps some traders hopeful. Based on reports from analyst Egrag Crypto, the monthly chart remains above the key 21-EMA, and that is being treated as the main guide for the coin’s long-term direction.

Monthly Chart Holds The Stronger Signal

According to Egrag’s multi-timeframe review, seven key charts were checked and six trade below the 21-day Exponential Moving Average. The weaker frames include the four-hour, one-day, three-day, five-day, one-week, and two-week charts.

XRP is trading at $2.18, up 8.5% over the last 24 hours, but shed a measly 0.8% on the weekly frame. That short-term fall explains the current mood among traders.

Big Upside Targets On The Table

Reports have disclosed that the analyst’s longer-term model keeps XRP inside a rising channel on the monthly chart.

The model points to a target band between $9 and $13, and the analyst gives this outcome a 55–65% probability within three to six months if the monthly candle holds above its support.

#XRP – The Chasm ( $13) – 7 Time Frames ( 1/8):

There is 1 Signal Matters Most. Right now, 6 time frames are bearish below the 21 EMA:

4H 1D 3D 5D 1W 2W But there’s 1 KING timeframe still bullish: 1M (Monthly) Above the 21 EMA

General Note: In TA,… pic.twitter.com/788Mk5u5Ng

— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) December 1, 2025

From today’s price, reaching $9 would require roughly an over 4x rise, while $13 would mean close to 7-fold jump. Those are large moves and would likely need strong momentum to happen quickly.

Other analysts recently projected a $4 price in about four months or by the end of 2026, citing Ripple’s plan to launch RLUSD in Japan by Q1 2026 as one possible driver.

Based on reports, spot XRP ETFs have bought over $756 million worth of the token in the weeks after their launch, a flow that some see as support for future gains.

Meanwhile, on-chain data shows Ripple’s escrow unlocked 1 billion XRP for December in two equal transactions of 500 million each.

The first transfer went to the Ripple (9) address on Tuesday. At the time of reporting, the Ripple (9) wallet held 500,000,204 XRP from that release.

One of the 500 million batches was valued at about $1.08 billion at the moment it moved. These monthly unlocks are routine, but they are watched closely by markets because of the extra supply that can enter circulation.

Short-term charts remain under pressure, and momentum indicators on lower timeframes are weak. Yet higher-timeframe momentum can shift quickly when buyers step in, and a single monthly close below or above the 21-EMA would change how analysts read the situation.

Based on reports, holders who follow the monthly structure are being urged to stay patient, while others warn that short-term selling could extend before any sustained recovery.

Featured image from Gemini, chart from TradingView