
Bitcoin gained fresh BTC price crash predictions as it fell to $85,000 in flash volatility at the monthly close thanks to a lack of liquidity.

Sony Bank is reportedly pursuing a US license and partnering with Bastion as it develops a 2026 dollar stablecoin connected to its growing Web3 unit, BlockBloom.
Canary Capital's dominance in the XRP ETF market could accelerate institutional adoption and influence future crypto investment strategies.
The post Canary Capital claims its XRP ETF surpasses all other XRP ETFs combined appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The significant liquidations highlight the volatility and risk in crypto markets, potentially deterring new investors and impacting market stability.
The post Bitcoin tumbles below $89,000, triggering over $200 million in long liquidations in past hour appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Quick Facts:
Ripple’s expanded MPI license in Singapore underscores how digital asset payment rails are moving into tightly regulated, institutional-grade territory.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s approach shows how clear taxonomy and licensing can turn crypto from speculative edge case into trusted infrastructure supporting cross-border and retail payment flows.
AI-powered content and fan platforms can now plug into compliant payment providers rather than hacking together unregulated rails, freeing them to focus on UX and monetization.
$SUBBD merges Web3 payments, staking, and proprietary AI tools to tackle high platform fees, arbitrary bans, and fragmented creator monetization while keeping earnings and content under creator control.Regulation is finally catching up with crypto’s real-world use cases.
Today, Ripple revealed that Singapore’s Monetary Authority (MAS) had approved an expanded scope of payment activities under the firm’s existing Major Payment Institution (MPI) license.
This essentially expands what Ripple can do with digital payment tokens like $XRP and its $RLUSD stablecoin in the city-state.

That matters far beyond cross-border remittances. Singapore’s rules under the Payment Services Act already made it a template for digital asset oversight; an expanded MPI further signals that regulators are comfortable with blockchain rails carrying serious volume.
This also lets developers tap regulated providers for fiat on/off ramps and token settlement. This lets you focus on user experience, IP control, and monetization instead of licensing headaches across multiple jurisdictions.
That’s where SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) comes in.
The Ethereum-based project positions itself as an AI-powered content creation and fan engagement hub, using crypto-native payments, staking, and token-gated access to help creators keep more of what they earn.
While players like Ripple standardize the underlying rails, SUBBD Token aims to turn that infrastructure into a usable toolkit for working creators and their communities.
Ripple isn’t alone. Exchanges like OKX and Bitstamp have also pursued MPI approvals in Singapore, as MAS leans into a licensing regime that treats digital payment tokens as core financial plumbing rather than a regulatory edge case.
For Web3 creator platforms, this maturation solves a basic problem: consistent access to compliant fiat ramps and cross-border settlement. This allows teams to lean on licensed entities for KYC, custody, and payouts.

In addition, it frees them to innovate on discovery algorithms, AI tools, and tokenized membership rather than building a shadow payments stack.
Several AI-plus-crypto platforms already chase this opportunity, from NFT-driven creator marketplaces to fan token ecosystems experimenting with governance and perks. In that crowd, SUBBD Token is one of the newer entrants.
The project frames itself as a vertically integrated stack for AI-assisted content creation, subscription monetization, and tokenized access rather than just another tipping coin or generic NFT storefront.
Get a full lowdown on the project in our What Is SUBBD Token page.
The pain points $SUBBD targets are familiar if you’ve ever tried to build an audience online: high fees, arbitrary moderation that could take down your account, and fragmented AI tools.
SUBBD’s thesis is simple: these are coordination problems that programmable money and AI can actually address.
On the creator side, the project underpins a suite of proprietary AI models for content generation, chatbots, and voice cloning, plus an AI Personal Assistant designed to automate routine fan interactions without feeling like a spam bot.

For users, SUBBD Token wraps this in token-based access and rewards: holders can unlock exclusive content, beta features, and XP multipliers, with governance hooks around creator onboarding, platform themes, and AI creator curation.
Staking adds another layer, which allows you to lock your purchased tokens for a fixed 20% APY in the first year, alongside perks like exclusive livestreams, in-house content, and daily BTS drops, before the system shifts toward more utility-based yields.
The market is responding positively to the project’s token presale, which has already raised over $1.3M and counting.
With tokens currently priced at $0.057075, it allows you to grab them and enjoy the perks that they offer at a fairly affordable price.
Go to our ‘How to Buy SUBBD Token’ guide for step-by-step instructions on investing in the project.
While it’s still fairly early to see how investors will see the project over the long term, our SUBBD price prediction sees a potential for it to hit a high of $0.48 by the end of 2026. Based on the current token price, this translates to an increase of about 741%.
If you believe clearer licensing for payment providers will accelerate Web3 creator tools, it might be worth tracking how SUBBD Token executes from presale promises to live, revenue-sharing infrastructure.
With just a day before the next price increase, now’s the time to get your share of $SUBBD tokens at a discounted price.
Join the SUBBD Token presale today.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice; always do your own research.
Authored by Bogdan Patru, Bitcoinist — https://bitcoinist.com/ripple-expands-singapore-subbd-token-soars
Bitcoin slid sharply on Sunday after failing to push above a key ceiling near $91,000, dropping almost 6% in a matter of hours and touching $85,800 on Coingecko. The sell-off came after the market posted a positive weekly close — the first after a run of four losing weeks — which briefly looked like a turning point before the rapid move lower.
Based on CoinGlass data, more than 180,000 traders were wiped out in the last 24 hours, with total liquidations hitting close to $540 million. Almost 90% of that value came from long bets, concentrated in Bitcoin and Ether.
Reports have disclosed that a sudden surge of selling volume triggered a chain reaction, where forced exits multiplied the price fall as margin positions were closed.
Some market commentators pointed to technical quirks as well. The CME gap that traders watch had been filled, and analysts said roughly $400 million of long positions were taken already, adding that downside liquidity was cleared first — a move he described as a useful clean-up for the market.
Crypto’s liquidity issue:
As seen countless times this year, Friday night and Sunday night often come with LARGE crypto moves.
Just now, we saw Bitcoin fall -$4,000 in a matter of minutes without ANY news at all.
Why? Liquidity is thin.
Then, add this to the fact that… https://t.co/BTRNPV8Y5a
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) December 1, 2025
The Kobeissi Letter noted the slide arrived without an obvious news trigger and said the pattern has been repeated many times this year, especially around late Friday and Sunday trading windows.
The broader backdrop also weighed on sentiment. Investors are watching possible shifts in Federal Reserve policy, and the prospect of higher interest rates tends to pressure risk assets like Bitcoin.
The token’s intraday range showed a low of $85,400 and a high of $90,600, highlighting how quickly prices are swinging. Average True Range (ATR) sits at 4,423, a sign of elevated day-to-day volatility, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a little over 38, moving toward oversold readings.
November proved rough. Reports show Bitcoin ended the month down 18%, its worst November since 2018, when prices fell 35% that same month.
Still, the asset has gained 10% year-to-date, giving some traders faith that recent weakness is more mechanical than fundamental.
Market Voices And What They SayAccording to CoinGlass and analysts quoted online, the majority of recent liquidations were long positions — a factor that magnified the drop.
Kobeissi argued this episode was structural, tied to crowded positions being unwound, and explicitly stated they did not view it as a fundamental decline. Some analysts remained upbeat, calling the move a positive reset for the month. On social platforms, debate is active about whether this shakeout clears the way for fresh accumulation.
Binance’s CEO Richard Teng has urged diversification during whipping markets, a reminder echoed across trading desks. Policymakers remain the key macro variable: a hawkish Fed tone could extend selling pressure, while a more dovish stance might steady prices.
Traders will watch liquidity levels, open interest, and whether large long squeezes subside, because those factors are likely to dictate near-term direction.
Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView
The digital asset landscape has matured significantly over the past several years. Simple spot holding is no longer the only viable strategy for generating substantial returns. Today’s market rewards precision, algorithmic discipline, and above all else, liquidity.
For skilled traders, the barrier to entry is rarely knowledge. Instead, it is capitalization. A trader may possess a strategy with a high Sharpe ratio and disciplined risk management, yet find their growth stunted by a personal account size that renders the math irrelevant.
This disconnect between skill and capital has given rise to a sophisticated ecosystem of crypto proprietary trading. The concept extends far beyond simply borrowing funds. It represents access to institutional-grade infrastructure that bridges the gap between retail speculation and professional execution.
Why do profitable traders fail to scale?
The answer often lies in mathematics rather than market movement. A trader operating with a 5,000 USDT personal account must take outsized risks to generate a livable income. This frequently leads to over-leveraging positions to the point of ruin. In contrast, a trader managing a funded account of 200,000 USDT can target conservative, low-variance moves and still generate substantial returns.
This dynamic creates what we might call the efficiency paradox: having more capital allows a trader to take less risk while making more money. By utilizing a proprietary firm’s resources, the focus shifts from desperate account flipping to sustainable wealth generation. The pressure to hit “home runs” evaporates entirely, replaced by the professional pursuit of consistent base hits.
When personal savings are on the line, emotional attachment distorts decision-making in profound ways. The fear of loss triggers the amygdala, causing traders to cut winners early. Even worse, it often leads to revenge trading after a loss. Proprietary trading constructs a firewall between the trader’s lifestyle and their trading capital, fundamentally changing the psychological equation.
In a funded environment, the downside is capped at a defined level. A trader might face a drawdown limit, but they are not risking their mortgage payment or emergency savings. This psychological freedom allows for the execution of strategies with cold, calculated precision. When the risk is systemic rather than personal, the trader can finally operate with the objectivity required to extract value from volatile markets.
Not all funding models are created equal, and the differences matter significantly. In the early days of prop trading, firms were largely focused on Forex. They treated crypto as an afterthought, offering poor spreads and artificial slippage. The modern crypto trader requires a specialized environment built specifically for digital assets. If the underlying technology does not mirror live exchange conditions, the strategy is doomed to fail regardless of its theoretical merit.
A robust trading infrastructure must offer direct access to order books without intermediaries. Whether a trader is scalping Bitcoin perpetuals or navigating complex options strategies, the execution must be instantaneous.
This is where the distinction between a simulation and a career-building platform becomes evident. Identifying the best crypto prop trading firm requires careful examination of the execution model. The key is looking for firms like HyroTrader that route through major liquidity providers like ByBit or Binance rather than internal dealing desks that trade against their clients.
A chart is only as good as its data feed, and this principle cannot be overstated. Artificial “wicks” designed to stop out retail traders are a hallmark of inferior platforms that prioritize their own profit over trader success. Professional prop firms utilize real-time data streams that ensure what a trader sees on the chart matches the global order book with complete accuracy.
For algorithmic traders and those utilizing automated bots, this transparency is non-negotiable. Strategies that rely on technical levels or high-frequency inputs cannot function properly if the price feed is manipulated or delayed. The ability to integrate tools like TradingView or connect via API directly to the exchange liquidity is what separates a gamified experience from a professional trading operation.

Founded in 2022 and based in Prague, HyroTrader is a proprietary trading firm specializing in cryptocurrency for traders. The company offers funded accounts of up to 200,000 USDT, which can be scaled to 1 million USDT with consistent performance.
Traders utilize real-time data to trade on ByBit or Binance through CLEO, ensuring authentic trading conditions. Profit sharing begins at 70% and can increase to 90%, with payouts made in USDT or USDC within 12-24 hours after earning $100 in profit.
Unlike many competitors, HyroTrader provides unlimited evaluation periods and refunds the challenge fee after the first payout, lowering entry costs. With over $2 million paid out and a global community, it offers a legitimate opportunity for skilled crypto traders to access institutional capital without risking personal funds.
The primary critique of proprietary trading is often the strictness of risk rules. However, these constraints are actually the training wheels of professionalism when viewed through the right lens. A 5% daily drawdown limit or a 10% maximum loss ceiling is not a trap designed to fail traders. It is a standard institutional risk parameter used by professionals worldwide. No hedge fund manager in the world is permitted to lose 20% of a portfolio in a single afternoon, and for good reason.
Learning to navigate these parameters is what refines a gambler into a genuine risk manager. The best environments offer unlimited time for evaluation, recognizing that quality trading cannot be rushed. The artificial pressure of a “30-day challenge” often forces traders to violate their own risk management rules just to beat the clock. Removing the time limit allows the trader to wait patiently for the highest probability setups, aligning their activity with market conditions rather than an arbitrary calendar deadline.
The trajectory for a crypto prop trader should not end at the initial funding stage. The true goal is scalability over time. A static account size eventually limits potential regardless of skill level, whereas a dynamic scaling plan rewards consistency and discipline.
Consider a roadmap that begins at 200,000 USDT. Through consistent performance, avoiding significant drawdowns, and hitting modest profit targets, a trader can see their allocation grow to 1,000,000 USDT. At this level, a profit split of 80% or 90% becomes genuinely life-changing, transforming trading from a side pursuit into a legitimate wealth-building vehicle.
Liquidity is king in any trading endeavor. In traditional finance, waiting 30 days for a wire transfer is standard practice. In the crypto ecosystem, money moves at the speed of the blockchain itself. Traders who live off their market returns require agility. They need the ability to request a withdrawal on a Sunday and receive USDT or USDC within hours rather than weeks.
This fluidity turns trading from a speculative venture into a reliable business operation with predictable cash flows. When profits can be realized and withdrawn immediately upon hitting a threshold, the feedback loop of success is powerfully reinforced. It allows the trader to compound their personal net worth steadily while leaving the firm’s capital at work in the markets.
The convergence of cryptocurrency volatility and proprietary capital offers a unique moment in financial history. It allows individuals with skills to act as institutional players, regardless of their geographic location or personal net worth. The playing field has never been more level for talented traders seeking meaningful opportunities.
Whether employing high-frequency trading bots, executing manual price-action strategies, or hedging with options, the vehicle matters as much as the driver. By leveraging significant capital without personal risk, utilizing direct exchange execution, and operating within professional risk parameters, traders can unlock the full potential of the crypto markets. The era of the undercapitalized retail trader is ending. The era of the funded professional has arrived.
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any of the projects mentioned in this article. Investors are encouraged to perform necessary due diligence.
The post Why Pro Traders Choose Crypto Prop Firms appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin’s big buyers seem to have stepped off the gas.
For the better part of the last year or so, it felt like there was a constant tailwind behind Bitcoin’s price. ETFs vacuumed up coins, stablecoin balances kept climbing, and traders were willing to go to insane levels of leverage to bet on more upside. NYDIG called these the “demand engines” of the cycle in its latest report. The company argued that several of those engines have reversed course: ETFs are seeing net outflows, the stablecoin base has stalled, and futures markets look cautious.
That sounds rather ominous if you only read the headline. Unfortunately, as always, the truth is always somewhere in the middle. We will walk through each of those engines, keep the focus on dollars in and out, and end with the practical question everyone cares about: if the big machines are really slowing, does it break the bull market or slow it down?
The simplest engine to understand is the ETF pipe. Since their launch in January 2024, spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US have brought in tens of billions of dollars in net inflows. That money came from advisers, hedge funds, family offices, and retail investors who chose a brokerage ticker as their preferred method of Bitcoin exposure. The crucial detail is that they were net buyers almost every week for most of the year.
But that pattern broke over the past month. On several days in November, the ETF complex logged heavy redemptions, including some of the largest outflows since launch. A few of the funds that had been reliable buyers (think BlackRock) flipped to net sellers. For anyone looking at a single day of data, it sure could have felt like the entire ETF market blew up.

The longer view is, of course, less dramatic but important nevertheless. Cumulative flows are still deeply positive, and all funds still hold a huge pool of Bitcoin. What changed is the direction of marginal money: instead of new cash flowing steadily in, some investors are taking profits, cutting exposure or moving into other trades. That means spot price no longer has a constant mechanical buyer sitting underneath it.
A lot of that behavior is tied to how investors now hedge and manage risk. Once regulators allowed much higher position limits on ETF options (from 25,000 to 250,000 contracts), institutions could run covered-call strategies and other overlays on top of their ETF holdings. That gave them more ways to adjust risk without dumping shares, but also drained some of the pure “buy and hold at any price” energy. When price surged toward the top, some investors capped their upside for income. When price rolled over, others used the same options market to hedge instead of adding more spot.
The second engine sits in stablecoins. If ETFs are the Wall Street-friendly funnel into Bitcoin, stablecoins are the crypto-native cash pile that lives inside the system. When USDT, USDC, and peers grow, it usually means more fresh dollars are arriving or at least being parked on exchanges ready to deploy. For much of the last year, Bitcoin’s big legs higher lined up with a growing stablecoin base.
That pattern is wobbling, as the total stablecoin supply has stopped growing and even shrunk a little in the past month. Different trackers disagree on the exact amount, but the drop is clear enough. Some of that can be put down to simple risk reduction: traders pulling money out of exchanges, funds rotating into Treasuries, and smaller tokens losing market share. But some of it is real withdrawal of capital from the market.
The takeaway here is straightforward: the pool of digital dollars that can chase Bitcoin higher is no longer expanding. That doesn’t automatically push price down, but it does mean every rally has to be funded out of a more or less fixed pot. There’s less “new money” sloshing around on exchanges that can instantly flood into BTC when sentiment turns.
The third engine lives in derivatives. Funding rates on perpetual futures are a fee that traders pay to keep those contracts in line with spot price. When funding is strongly positive, it usually means many traders are long with leverage and are paying to stay that way. When funding goes negative, shorts are paying longs and the market is skewed toward bets on downside. The “basis” on regulated futures like CME is simply the gap between futures and spot. A big positive basis usually shows strong demand to be long with leverage.
NYDIG points out that both of these gauges have cooled. Funding on offshore perpetuals has flipped negative at times. CME futures premia have compressed. Open interest is lower than it was at the peak. This tells us a lot of leveraged longs were washed out in the recent drawdown and haven’t rushed back. Traders are more cautious, and in some pockets they’re now willing to pay for downside protection instead of upside exposure.
This matters for two reasons. First, leveraged buyers are often the marginal force that takes a move from a healthy uptrend to a vertical blow-off. If they’re nursing losses or sitting on the sidelines, moves tend to be slower, choppier and significantly less fun for anyone hoping for instant all-time highs. Second, when leverage builds in one direction, it can amplify both gains and crashes. A market with less leverage can still move a lot, but it’s less prone to sudden air pockets triggered by liquidations.
So if ETFs are leaking, stablecoins are flat, and derivatives traders are cautious, who’s on the other side of this selloff?
Here is where the picture becomes more subtle. On-chain data and exchange metrics suggest that some long-term holders have used the recent volatility to take profits. Coins that sat dormant for long periods have started to move again. At the same time, there are signs that newer wallets and smaller buyers are quietly accumulating. Some address clusters that rarely spend have also added to their balances. And some retail flows on large exchanges still lean toward net buying on the worst days.
That is the core of NYDIG’s “reversal, not doom” framing. The most visible, headline-friendly demand engines have shifted into reverse just as price cooled. Underneath that, there’s still a slow transfer from older, richer cohorts to newer ones. The flow of this money is choppier and less mechanical than the ETF boom period, which makes the market feel harsher for anyone who arrived late. But it isn’t the same thing as capital vanishing altogether.
First, the easy mode is more or less gone for now. For much of the year, ETF inflows and growing stablecoin balances acted like a one-way escalator. You didn’t need to know much about futures funding or options limits to understand why price kept grinding higher, because new money kept arriving. That background bid has faded and, in some weeks, flipped into net selling, making drawdowns feel heavier and rallies harder to sustain.
Second, a slowdown in demand engines does’t automatically kill a cycle. Bitcoin’s long-run case still revolves around fixed supply, growing institutional rails and a steady expansion of places where it can sit on balance sheets, and those structures are still in place.
What changes is the path between here and the next high. Instead of a straight line driven by one giant narrative, the market will start trading more on positioning and pockets of liquidity. ETF flows may swing between red and green, stablecoins may bounce around a plateau instead of sprinting higher, and derivatives markets may spend more time in neutral. That kind of environment rewards patience more than bravado.
Finally, if you zoom out, reversals in the demand engines are part of how every cycle breathes. Heavy inflows set the stage for overextension, but then outflows and cooling leverage force a reset. New buyers arrive at lower prices, usually quieter and with less fanfare. NYDIG’s argument is that Bitcoin is somewhere in that reset phase, and the data supports that view.
The engines that drove the first leg of the bull run are running slower, some in reverse, but it doesn’t mean the machine is broken. It means the next leg will depend less on automatic pipes and more on whether investors still want to own this thing once the easy part has passed.
The post Bitcoin’s bull market: A slowdown, not a breakdown appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Things went from zero to hundred real quick!
Hayes says Monad's tokenomics is its ultimate weakness.HBAR price is down about 6% in the past 24 hours, underperforming an already weak crypto market. Even with this pressure, the chart is flashing a rare mix of three early rebound clues that most mid-caps are not showing right now.
If the broader market steadies, HBAR could be one of the first to move, especially if it protects a key support level discussed later.
HBAR has moved inside a broad falling wedge since early September. This pattern often turns bullish when sellers lose control near the lower boundary, and that shift first appeared around November 21.
The first clue comes from the changing volume behavior. HBAR’s activity follows a Wyckoff-style color pattern: red shows sellers in control, yellow shows sellers gaining control, blue marks buyers gaining control, and green shows buyers fully in control.
Since HBAR peaked at $0.155 on November 23 and fell nearly 15%, the bars have shifted from heavy red to a blend of yellow and blue. That blend is a classic sign of seller exhaustion and early tug-of-war. The last time this mix showed up — between October 15 and October 28 — HBAR climbed 41% right after.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
A second clue appears in the MFI (Money Flow Index), which tracks buying and selling pressure using both price and volume. Between November 23 and December 1, the HBAR price kept making lower highs while MFI made higher highs. That divergence shows dips are being quietly bought. A similar divergence formed between October 6 and October 24 and led to a 33% jump once it completed.
The third clue comes from steady spot ETF demand. The Canary HBAR Spot ETF has posted positive weekly inflows in four of the last five weeks, with more than $80 million in cumulative inflows. Inflows are smaller than late October, but they remain positive even as price falls — meaning broader demand has not vanished.
Together, these three clues — shifting volume control, dip-buying pressure, and ongoing ETF inflows — show early accumulation forming beneath the surface.
The wedge’s lower boundary near $0.122 is the most important support for HBAR right now. Holding that area keeps the rebound case alive. Losing it exposes the next major zone near $0.079, which would flip the structure from “early accumulation” to a deeper slide.
For strength, HBAR needs to reclaim $0.140 first, a 5% rebound from the current level. That would show that buyers are finally overpowering the sell-side pressure. If $0.140 breaks, the next major level sits at $0.155. Clearing $0.155 opens the path toward $0.169 and even $0.182 if the crypto market improves.
The post HBAR Drops 6% as Market Weakens, Yet 3 Early Rebound Clues Appear appeared first on BeInCrypto.
In today’s markets, uncertainty has become the new normal, putting pressure on traders and investors alike. Changing tariffs, shifting monetary policies, and persistent tensions are weighing on sentiment and dampening global growth. The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) expects global growth to decline to 2.3%, just 0.2 percentage points above the threshold for a global recession.
But beneath it all lies another enduring threat: inflation. Even as numbers improve, its effects continue to ripple through asset prices, investor behavior, and risk perceptions. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global inflation is projected to fall to 4.2%, down from 5.9% in 2024 and 6.8% in 2023. On paper, this is progress, but it’s nowhere near the levels it considers healthy.
For traders and investors, this means that while inflation may no longer dominate headlines, its presence will still define the landscape. Still shaping where capital flows, how portfolios are hedged, and which assets emerge as safe havens. And this is why many are now asking: Could crypto be emerging as the next inflation hedge, challenging the long-standing dominance of traditional safe havens?
Safe havens tend to perform reasonably well during recessions, and for decades, gold has been the default refuge, an anchor during economic storms. In recent years, bitcoin has emerged as its digital challenger, often described as “digital gold.” But that comparison might not be entirely grounded in reality. Let’s take a closer look.
On the surface, they seem alike, sharing certain traits: they are both scarce, speculative, and finite. Both are used in a limited capacity for transactions, influenced by demand, and dependent on third parties such as miners for supply. Yet, their behavior tells a different story.
Although cryptocurrencies tend to behave similarly to traditional assets during inflation, i.e., lose value, they behave differently when policy uncertainty is added to the equation. During past geopolitical instability, we have seen the market treat certain cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin, as safe havens. The reason behind this phenomenon is that cryptocurrencies are decoupled from government policy and currency manipulation, giving them an independent appeal during institutional mistrust.
This isn’t theoretical. Bitcoin rallied before and after the 2016 US elections, during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, and at other global events when confidence in traditional systems wavered. The question then isn’t whether bitcoin can move during uncertain times, but whether it can protect.
A study by Sangyup Choi and Junhyeok Shin of Yonsei University’s School of Economics found that while bitcoin tends to depreciate during periods of financial uncertainty, it rises in value during times of policy uncertainty, precisely because it operates independently of governments and central banks.
We are now in such a period, one defined by both geopolitical tensions and shifting trade policies. In these conditions, investors often diversify across assets that aren’t directly tied to fiscal or monetary decisions. This is where bitcoin’s appeal lies: it represents freedom from institutional control, a self-contained system that functions outside the traditional policy loop.
Another study highlights the fact that it may be a strong hedge for oil, the US dollar, EU indices, and ETFs. It also suggests that the correlation between gold, bitcoin, and US indices such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 may indicate that investors are also starting to view the cryptocurrency as a safe haven.
Still, there is an important caveat. Cryptocurrencies remain inherently volatile, and bitcoin’s short history means its safe-haven status is conditional, not guaranteed. Gold, by contrast, has earned its reputation over centuries. For risk-averse traders, gold still offers stability, while bitcoin, with its asymmetric upside, may serve as a diversification tool rather than a replacement.
A hedge is only as effective as the conditions that power it. In periods of volatility or uncertainty, when CFD traders turn to instruments like gold or bitcoin CFDs to manage exposure, execution quality becomes critical. In those decisive moments, it’s the trading conditions that determine whether your strategy holds or breaks.
Exness provides CFD traders better-than-market conditions, meaning spreads, execution, and withdrawals that outperform what’s typically available to market participants. Its proprietary engine ensures precise execution, even during high-impact news,1 when traders need to rely on it the most for their hedge.
Price transparency and stable spreads also play a critical role. With its stable spreads on BTCUSD, which are four times lower than the industry average,2and the best spreads on XAUUSD,3Exness ensures that both digital and traditional hedges, like gold and bitcoin, work as intended.
The experience extends beyond the time markets are open. Exness has been offering the fastest withdrawals since 2009, and today, 98% of withdrawals are processed automatically.4
In essence, hedging with Exness means hedging with more control. CFD traders can execute, manage, and withdraw with the same confidence that drives their strategies, no matter how turbulent the markets become.
1 Precise execution claims refer to average slippage rates on pending orders based on data collected between September 2024 and July 2025 for XAUUSD, USOIL, and BTC CFDs on the Exness Standard account vs similar accounts offered by four other brokers. Delays and slippage may occur. No guarantee of execution speed or precision is provided.
2 4x more stable spreads claim refers to maximum BTCUSD CFDs spreads on the Exness Pro account, based on data collected from 12 to 25 May 2025, compared with average maximum BTCUSD CFDs spreads across the tightest commission-free accounts offered by eight other brokers.
3 Best spread claims refer to the lowest maximum spreads and the tightest average spreads on the Exness Pro account, for XAUUSD and USOIL, based on data collected from 12-25 May 2025, when compared to the corresponding spreads across commission-free accounts of other brokers.
4 At Exness, over 98% of withdrawals are processed automatically. Processing times may vary depending on the chosen payment method.
The post Inflation’s Silent Threat: Is Crypto Creeping in on Traditional Diversifiers’ Turf? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
What to Know:
Bitcoin’s narrative is shifting again. After a decade of proving itself as pristine collateral and macro hedge, attention is swinging back to utility: payments that actually feel instant, and apps that don’t grind to a halt when demand spikes.
Yet on the base layer, Bitcoin still moves slowly, with limited capacity of just seven transactions per second, and no native smart contracts. That mismatch is becoming harder to ignore as users experience sub-second confirmations and near-zero fees on newer chains.
When you can move assets cheaply and interact with DeFi in real time elsewhere, waiting minutes for a Bitcoin transaction feels like a relic from another era. The demand is clear: keep Bitcoin’s battle-tested security, but upgrade the experience.
This is where Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) enters the scene. The project positions itself as a Bitcoin Layer-2 that integrates the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), promising Solana-style performance anchored to Bitcoin’s trust layer.
If it works, Bitcoin-native dApps stop being theory and start being everyday tools. And the $HYPER presale structure doubles down on that thesis.
With a staged price schedule and a $28.8M+ raise, early conviction is rewarded: those stepping in now are effectively betting that Bitcoin Hyper can become a go-to hub for high-speed, Bitcoin-backed DeFi and dApps, not just another speculative token.
Discover more about this Layer-2 project in our comprehensive Bitcoin Hyper review.
Bitcoin Hyper pitches a straightforward value proposition: turn Bitcoin from a slow settlement rail into a high-throughput environment where you can pay, trade, lend, and game at speeds that compete with top Layer-1s.
Instead of fighting Bitcoin’s limitations, it will route activity to a Layer-2 execution environment while anchoring security back to the main chain.
By integrating the SVM, Bitcoin Hyper aims to deliver faster performance than Solana itself for many use cases, while still treating $BTC as the core asset in the ecosystem. That means high-speed payments in wrapped $BTC with low fees, plus DeFi primitives – like swaps, lending, and staking – that feel responsive rather than congested.
The project also targets builders with a Rust-based SDK and API support for NFT platforms and gaming dApps, giving developers a familiar toolkit while tapping into Bitcoin’s liquidity.
The early traction is notable: the presale has already raised $28.8M, signaling that the market sees potential in a Bitcoin Layer-2 that targets Solana-level speed.
Check out our guide to buying Bitcoin Hyper if you plan to join the presale.
For Bitcoin holders tired of choosing between security and usability, Bitcoin Hyper offers a different trade-off: keep $BTC at the center, but get Solana-style speed and dApp depth. And as the presale races toward the $30M milestone, it’s securing investors and liquidity to entrench that position.
The presale’s pricing, early staking incentives, and clear focus on SVM-powered performance give $HYPER a differentiated pitch in a crowded market.
Bitcoin Hyper currently costs $0.013355 per token and dynamic staking at 40% APY right now. According to our Bitcoin Hyper price prediction, $HYPER has the potential to end 2026 at $0.08625 – that’s a ~546% ROI on today’s price.
Looking further ahead, $HYPER could reach $0.253 by 2030, a significant ~1,794% ROI. That upside scenario assumes the project becomes a leading venue for Bitcoin-native DeFi and high-throughput applications, not just another experimental scaling play.
Momentum indicators are starting to line up with that thesis. Smart money is moving, with high-net-worth wallets joining the presale. Whale buys of $502.6K and $379.9K have contributed to $HYPER’s $28.8M-strong presale.
Combined with 40% staking APY and rewards geared toward active governance, the tokenomics are clearly designed to favor early, engaged participants.
Bitcoin Hyper’s rise as a candidate for best crypto to buy now reflects a deeper shift in the market: users want Bitcoin’s credibility paired with modern UX.
If Bitcoin Hyper can bridge that gap between store-of-value and everyday utility and deliver on its promise of extremely low-latency execution, fast smart contracts, and a growing catalog of dApps, it could become a natural hub for Bitcoin-native activity.
Join the $HYPER presale before the next price increase.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice of any kind. Always do your own research before making any investment decision.
Authored by Aaron Walker, NewsBTC – https://www.newsbtc.com/news/best-crypto-to-buy-now-as-bitcoin-hyper-presale-nears-30m
XRP’s derivatives market has undergone a marked regime shift, with leverage collapsing and funding normalising in a way that signals a clear retreat from aggressive speculative positioning. The strongest evidence comes from Glassnode’s latest post on November 30, which frames the current phase as a structural, not merely tactical, pause in XRP leverage.
“XRP’s futures OI has fallen from 1.7B XRP in early October to 0.7B XRP (~59% flush-out). Paired with the funding rate dropping from ~0.01% to 0.001% (7D-SMA), 10/10 marked a structural pause in XRP speculators’ appetite to bet aggressively on upside,” Glassnode’s CryptoVizArt wrote on X.
Open interest at 1.7 billion XRP in early October reflected a heavily leveraged market, with large notional positions stacked in futures and perpetuals. The subsequent collapse to 0.7 billion XRP implies that around one billion XRP of derivatives exposure has been closed, liquidated, or otherwise unwound. Such a reduction is not just a marginal trimming of risk; it is a wholesale deleveraging that strips out a large part of the speculative layer sitting on top of the spot market.
The funding-rate move is equally telling. A 7-day SMA around 0.01% had previously indicated a consistent long bias, with traders willing to pay a recurring fee to maintain leveraged upside exposure. The compression to roughly 0.001% pushes funding close to neutral. In perpetual futures, that transition typically occurs when demand for leveraged longs fades and the market no longer tolerates a meaningful premium to hold long positions.
Glassnode’s description of October 10 crash as the point that “marked a structural pause” captures this shift in regime: the market moved from persistent long crowding to a far more cautious, balanced stance. The November 30 post sits on top of a broader context Glassnode has been documenting through November.
In November 8, the firm highlighted how profit taking has behaved during the recent drawdown: “Unlike previous profit realization waves that aligned with rallies, since late September, as XRP fell from $3.09 (~25%) to $2.30, profit realization volume (7D-SMA) surged by ~240%, from $65M/day to $220M/day. This divergence underscores distribution into weakness, not strength.” Rather than de-risking into strength, profitable holders have been realizing gains as price fell, reinforcing the deleveraging signalled by futures data.
On November 17, Glassnode turned to supply dynamics, noting that “the share of XRP supply in profit has fallen to 58.5%, the lowest since Nov 2024, when price was $0.53. Today, despite trading ~4× higher ($2.15), 41.5% of supply (~26.5B XRP) sits in loss — a clear sign of a top-heavy and structurally fragile market dominated by late buyers.” Those on-chain figures provide the background to the 30 November derivatives snapshot: a market whose ownership is skewed toward late entrants now sits on substantial unrealized losses, while the leverage that previously amplified upside has been largely flushed.
Taken together, Glassnode’s data on futures open interest and funding rates crystallise the current state of XRP: a violent 59% leverage reset, a near-neutral funding regime, and a speculative cohort that has stepped back from paying for upside, all layered on top of a top-heavy holder base.
At press time, XRP traded at $2.04.